Counter-Strike 2 is a CPU cache-bound workload. Source 2 loads most of its render and physics data into L3 cache — if the CPU has a large cache (32 MB+), it stays fast. If not, it constantly falls back to RAM, which adds latency.

That's the whole trick behind X3D CPUs: AMD packs 64 MB of extra L3 cache onto the die. In games like CS2 / Valorant / R6 / OW2 it acts like a 30-40% performance boost over equally-clocked non-X3D CPUs. In productivity tasks (encoding, rendering) the cache does nothing — that's where Intel CPUs with more cores win.

Our rating weights:

  1. CS2 FPS at 1080p Low (40%) — the primary use case
  2. Esports all-around performance (20%) — Valorant, Apex, R6, OW2
  3. Platform future (15%) — can I upgrade in 2 years without swapping the motherboard?
  4. Price/performance (15%)
  5. Power draw + thermals (10%)

Productivity performance explicitly does not factor into the gaming rating — if you need encoding muscle, Intel is often the better fit. But that's a different test.